Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 23:23:30 GMT 12
Google's strategy of serving advertising based on the content of Gmail emails does not constitute an invasion of privacy. This is the understanding of judge Felipe Gonçalves Pinto, of the 2nd Federal Court of Piauí, who did not accept the arguments of the Federal Public Ministry, which in a public civil action asked the company to stop the practice. Disclosure Judge highlighted that, when creating an account on Gmail, users already agree to the use of their data. This is not a definitive decision, as what Judge Gonçalves Pinto did was deny advance relief in the case. The judgment on the merits will still be analyzed. But the judge's reflections on this first decision are revealing. For the judge, Google is not invading the user's privacy, as it does not read the content of the message.
The practice would simply be to identify Buy Phone Number List keywords in what is written and then promote advertisements based on them. The MPF wanted a requirement to be established for Google to ask Gmail users for specific authorization to carry out this practice. According to Gonçalves Pinto, authorization has already been granted. “I note that in a specific topic in Google's Privacy Policy, when opening a Google account, the user must expressly agree, in a specific window, with the use of data, therefore I do not see any illegality on the part of the defendant”, states the judge in the decision. Considering that it is an institution that represents an entire class of professionals, the failure to provide this service by the OAB to its users tarnishes its image and reputation", concluded the judge.
Financial collection methods in schools are regulated by Law 9,870/1999, which is clear in prohibiting any pedagogical penalties for students in case of default, he argues. For him, the agenda aims at contact between teachers and their students and guardians and should be used to deal with issues related to studies, which could hinder student achievement if this is not respected. The plaintiff requested payment of R$50,000, but the judge set the compensation at R$6,000. The case number was not disclosed as it is under judicial secrecy. The sentence annulled the act that denied the student's enrollment, as it “exceeded the limits and the very reasonableness of the convening instrument and the governing legislation that it aimed to comply with.
The practice would simply be to identify Buy Phone Number List keywords in what is written and then promote advertisements based on them. The MPF wanted a requirement to be established for Google to ask Gmail users for specific authorization to carry out this practice. According to Gonçalves Pinto, authorization has already been granted. “I note that in a specific topic in Google's Privacy Policy, when opening a Google account, the user must expressly agree, in a specific window, with the use of data, therefore I do not see any illegality on the part of the defendant”, states the judge in the decision. Considering that it is an institution that represents an entire class of professionals, the failure to provide this service by the OAB to its users tarnishes its image and reputation", concluded the judge.
Financial collection methods in schools are regulated by Law 9,870/1999, which is clear in prohibiting any pedagogical penalties for students in case of default, he argues. For him, the agenda aims at contact between teachers and their students and guardians and should be used to deal with issues related to studies, which could hinder student achievement if this is not respected. The plaintiff requested payment of R$50,000, but the judge set the compensation at R$6,000. The case number was not disclosed as it is under judicial secrecy. The sentence annulled the act that denied the student's enrollment, as it “exceeded the limits and the very reasonableness of the convening instrument and the governing legislation that it aimed to comply with.
Thankyou to those from NZ, Australia, Japan & America who have so far visited. Feel free to browse & post 